Why Does Paying for Dinner Feel Better Than Paying for Parking?

Uri Gneezy discusses how mental accounting affects our perception of incentives, making some incentives feel more significant than others. 

The Quirks of Mental Accounting:
* Mental accounting dictates that not all expenses are perceived equally.
* Paying for dinner might feel less painful than paying for parking, despite similar costs.
* Our perception of expenses is influenced by various factors, including context and personal significance.
* Understanding what people care about and using it as a currency can make incentives more effective.

Leveraging Mental Accounting for Effective Incentives:
* Gneezy’s collaboration with Edmunds, a car company, exemplifies the power of mental accounting in incentivizing consumer behavior.
* Traditional cash discounts may seem insignificant when compared to the overall cost of a purchase.
* Identifying expenses that people find more painful, such as fueling a car, can lead to more effective incentives.
* Offering $400 for fuel was more effective than offering a $400 discount on a car purchase, as fuel expenses are more painful for people.

Listen to full conversation between Uri & Jasravee Kaur Chandra on Cracking the Code of Incentives – In Marketing, Organizations & Real Life

Uri Gneezy is a Professor of Economics and Strategy and the Epstein/Atkinson Chair in Behavioral Economics, Rady School of Management, University of California, San Diego.

Leave a comment